Call Now 323-464-6700 for a Free Consultation

How Miranda Rights Influence Driving Under the Influence Cases

Upon stopping at a DUI checkpoint, you may be unsure how to interact with the investigation officers. The uncertainty arises from your need to protect your rights and cooperate with the law enforcement authorities at the same time. Although you may be aware of the Miranda rights, their influence on your DUI case could be significant. Subsequently, learning of the various requirements and circumstances where the rights apply to protect you is important.

Additionally, receiving legal support and advice from a DUI attorney is recommended. They are well versed with the procedures that occur at a DUI checkpoint. As a result, you will have a reliable source of information to determine when to invoke your Miranda rights. On top of this, you can identify situations amounting to violations of your rights. In doing so, your DUI lawyer can raise important concerns in court to prevent the prosecution from using unfairly obtained evidence.

Understanding the Nature of Miranda Rights

Upon being stopped by police and facing an arrest, you may feel the need to protect yourself by making statements in self-defense. However, these utterances often do more harm than good because you are likely to expose some self-incriminating details.

After the landmark case of Miranda v Arizona, the supreme court decided to impose protective rights for any arrested suspect. These rights exist to prevent you from giving self-incriminating evidence that will have direct influences on your trial case outcome.

Their content should provide avenues to prevent self-incrimination after arrest. Thus, the first statement should inform you of your right to remain silent after arrest. Secondly, you should be informed of your right to have a lawyer present during subsequent interrogations. If you are unable to afford one, the state should provide an attorney for free.

Therefore, cumulatively, these entitlements are referred to as Miranda rights and should be read out to any suspect, including DUI offenders. Upon stopping at a DUI checkpoint to investigate driving under the influence, the officers should be aware of your rights.

The law mandates any DUI police officer to read out the Miranda rules after being arrested and taken into custody. While in detention, the subsequent process involves formal interrogations to reveal more details regarding the offense. Thus, the interrogating officer should also be careful to read out the Miranda rules for a proper brief of your rights.

Various Ways for Officers to Inform you of Miranda Rights

The language used after arrest may vary as long as you understand your rights and can choose to invoke them. Although many expect officers to inform them of their rights in straightforward sentences, the statements often differ. Nonetheless, the bottom line should be to establish whether you understand your rights and can use them to protect yourself.

Since officers are free to use related language while informing you of your rights, you can expect any of the following statements:

  • Any statement you make will be used against you during trial

  • You can exercise your right to remain silent

  • You can have your attorney present or have the state appoint one for you.

Inapplicability of Miranda Rules

Although learning your Miranda rights upon interaction with an officer is necessary, the officers do not have to read them out in specific circumstances. This is because you do not face any threat of self-incrimination, particularly if no arrest has been made.

Often, Miranda rights will not be read when a DUI officer is merely conducting preliminary investigations. Secondly, an officer can withhold information regarding the rights if you have not undergone a formal interrogation.

Waiving your Miranda Rights

Sometimes, you may be confident of your non-involvement in a DUI violation, leading to a Miranda rights waiver. In this case, you will have given the officers a chance to ask you questions that could yield self-incriminating evidence. Subsequently, your decision should be made in light of possible outcomes.

Although most arrested persons expressly choose to waive their rights, others do it passively. An express waiver involves accepting the officer’s inquiries and acknowledging that you are fine with their outcomes. On the other hand, implied waivers are depicted from your non-verbal cues.

For example, if you nod after an officer asks you a question or show engagement as they ask you for information, you will have passively waived your rights. However, you should note that all implied waivers should be voluntarily given to avoid compromising your constitutional rights. In case of any coercion from police officers, we recommend speaking to your attorney as soon as possible for further guidance.

Further, your waiver of rights is always reversible, meaning that you can apply them again. Contrary to popular notions, officers should not prohibit you from changing your mind, provided the rights are applicable. Nonetheless, any details provided during your waiver period are relevant to your DUI case.

Miranda Rights Influence

Having understood the importance of Miranda rights for anyone facing arrest, it is easier to see their influence in a DUI case. The rights serve to protect suspects from providing self-incriminating evidence in specific circumstances. This then translates to the prosecutor's access to vital evidence for a court presentation.

Any criminal trial, including DUI matters, must be presented procedurally. Firstly, a prosecutor is appointed to your case and represents the state or the aggrieved party. This means that their goal is to show that you are guilty of the alleged offense by presenting arguments backed by credible evidence.

On top of this, you should note that the burden of proof in criminal cases rests on the prosecutor, as they allege the facts regarding legal violations. As a result, the prosecution team puts in the effort to ensure that all presentations to the judge can prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. To do this efficiently, evidence should be available as a source of emphasis or credibility.

Since officers at a DUI checkpoint will rely on the evidence they retrieve from the investigation, any utterances you make are included. However, your statements should not be considered if they were recorded as a violation of Miranda rights. Subsequently, these statements are disqualified as evidential sources capable of influencing the judge's final verdict.

While in court, your attorney is responsible for proving that the law enforcement officers in the DUI checkpoint violated your Miranda rights. They can do this by providing credible evidence regarding the various activities that the police undertook. Common examples of actions violating Miranda rights include:

Failure to Issue the Miranda Warning

Some officers may act out of malice or negligence and fail to inform you of your Miranda rights entirely. Due to this, a suspect with little to no knowledge will provide self-incriminating evidence and risk facing harsh penalties. However, since the entire process is unfair, any evidence gathered from the statements may be ruled out.

Continuous Interrogations After the Suspect Remains Silent

If you have already chosen to remain quiet after arrest, officers should not continue to probe you into giving information. Any tricks or persuasions used against you to retrieve information should be reported, and the details collected should be discarded. The discarded information should therefore not influence the judge’s decision, provided you issued it after choosing to invoke Miranda rights.

Using Coercive Means to Make the Suspect Waive Their Miranda Rights

Similarly, details collected after officers force you to waive your Miranda rights are inadmissible as evidence in court. Typically, coercion occurs by the use of force, threats, or undue influence on the suspect. For example, a traffic officer may threaten to add exaggerated information to your police report if you fail to speak.

You should note that these modes of coercion amount to police misconduct and are punishable by law. After going through any forceful interrogation, you should inform your attorney of the occurrences as soon as possible. Alternatively, you can try to avoid coercion by insisting on having your lawyer present during the entire interrogation process.

Ignoring the Suspect’s Request to Have a Lawyer Present

Among the available rights is having your attorney present as you face a DUI interrogation. However, some officers may refuse to comply with your requests and proceed with the exercise. In case of this experience, your lawyer will raise the officer’s behavior in court as a sign of misconduct and coercion.

Often, the involved officers will not outrightly deny you the right to speak to your attorney. Instead, they may intentionally delay contacting them or claim that the lawyer is unavailable without contacting them. Remaining alert and observing the officers’ actions is advisable to help you determine their genuineness in upholding your rights.

Proceeding With the Custodial Investigation Without Reading Miranda Rights

As discussed, the arresting DUI officer may choose to read out the Miranda rights only when beginning the formal investigation. This means that you will already be in custody but will not have provided any details.

If the interrogating officer begins the process and retrieves information from you without reading the Miranda rights, the evidence may be discarded. When presenting your case, your attorney should provide specific details that led to the unlawful interrogation. Since they may not have been present, your account of events plays a significant role in giving relevant evidence.

How Additional Evidential Sources Can Overshadow Miranda Rights Violations

The significance of evidence from other sources to the prosecutor’s case plays a similar role to statement evidence. While the presiding judge is more likely to rule out any evidence collected by violating Miranda rights, other sources are still relevant. As a result, the judge may issue a guilty verdict despite the reported Miranda rules violation.

Common sources of admissive evidence for use in court include:

Test Results from Your Preliminary Alcohol Screening

If you consented to a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) test, the results would be admissible as proof of intoxication in court. This is the case, especially if the results show a reading above the 0.08% mark.

The Presence of Any Drug Paraphernalia in Your Car

Although you may refuse to undertake any preliminary tests and remain silent after arrest, drug paraphernalia recovered from your car serves as evidence. Naturally, having alcohol bottles, marijuana sachets, syringes, or any other items linked to drug abuse can provide unmistakable proof of indulging in drinking and driving.

Previous DUI Violations in Your Record

Having a previous DUI record can also reduce your credibility while undergoing a trial. This is the case, especially if the previous violations occurred within ten years and attracted penalties. The track record may be sufficient to demonstrate your likelihood of violating DUI regulations. Consequently, the presiding judge may rely on this information to make a decision.

Footage from Traffic Surveillance

You should remember that most highways in the state have traffic surveillance cameras to monitor drivers’ behavior on the road. Typically, the investigation officers have an easy time identifying drunk driving based on the prevalence of road recklessness.

Additionally, the footage can show your drunken stupor as you exit your car and begin to engage with the traffic officers. In the end, this information is still enough to prosecute and convict you in case of any violations.

Contact a DUI Attorney Near Me

Before navigating a legal process, you should understand the various requirements and limitations that you face. Moreover, being aware of the different possible outcomes for your matter can help you make adequate preparations. This includes seeking legal guidance from a qualified DUI attorney who will help raise defenses in a DUI hearing. If you suspect that your Miranda rights were violated, contacting your attorney should be your priority. They will provide reliable counsel regarding the process after arrest and avoid giving self-incriminating evidence.

By contacting the Jonathan Franklin DUI Attorney, you will be in touch with a highly experienced team of DUI lawyers. Our services are crafted towards providing excellent legal assistance for better chances in a successful case outcome. Our team is also conscious of the varying needs of each client. Subsequently, you will benefit from our personalized services that aim at reaching unique outcomes. For more information, give us a call at 323-464-6700.

Board of Governors,

America's Top-Ranked Law School For Trial Advocacy

Stetson University DUI Program

Contact Information

Jonathan Franklin DUI Attorney
6777 Hollywood Blvd Ste 508
Los Angeles, CA 90028